Skip to content

Conversation

@bogwar
Copy link
Collaborator

@bogwar bogwar commented Mar 10, 2025

Real World Asset ledgers require several management APIs that would allow authorised entities to carry out ledger changes. This standard introduces two new blocktypes:

  • block type 122burn that records tokens from an account were burned by an authorised party
  • blocktype 122mint that records that tokens were minted to an account by an authorised party

@bogwar bogwar changed the title ICRC-122: a standard for a Burn interface ICRC-122: a standard for authorised Mint/Burn blocks Mar 11, 2025
@bogwar bogwar changed the title ICRC-122: a standard for authorised Mint/Burn blocks ICRC-122: ledger blocks recording management actions -- authorised mint, authorised burn blocks Apr 4, 2025
@bogwar bogwar requested a review from Copilot April 7, 2025 13:59
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

ICRCs/ICRC-122/ICRC-122.md:7

  • There is a documentation inconsistency regarding account representation: line 7 specifies an array of two Value variants (using an empty Blob for no subaccount) while line 48 describes an array of one or two blobs. Please clarify and standardize the account format.
Accounts are recorded as an `Array` of two `Value` variants, where the first element is a `variant { Blob = <owner principal> }`, representing the account owner, and the second element is a `variant { Blob = <subaccount> }`, representing the subaccount.

Copy link
Member

@marc0olo marc0olo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bogwar provided some comments.

@marc0olo marc0olo self-requested a review May 20, 2025 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants